← Selected research

Coarse-grained modeling / Representation learning

CG JEPA: polymer representations and physical prediction

An exploratory study of JEPA-style learning for polymer dynamics, examining which molecular information survives encoding and whether it helps predict future physical observables.

Exploratory phase completed

My role. Molecular representation development, controlled ablation studies, baseline comparisons, and physical-readout analysis.

Research question

Which local and geometric information should a coarse-grained polymer representation retain to support useful physical prediction?

Approach

  • Built periodic molecular graphs and temporal-learning pipelines for polymer trajectories, with local molecular descriptors and chain-level representations.
  • Compared JEPA-style predictors with persistence, linear autoregression, supervised graph models, and random-encoder controls using common physical observables.
  • Examined token fields, local packing information, chain pooling, and relative-displacement representations through controlled ablations.
  • Separated current-state representation quality from fixed-horizon future prediction, retaining technical-seed comparisons, time-block uncertainty estimates, and negative results.

What the exploration showed

  • Local packing information contributed to physical prediction in the tested pipelines; deleting an input field did not necessarily remove the same information from graph connections and other channels.
  • Explicit relative-displacement representations improved current chain-geometry readouts and retained useful signals for future physical observables. These improvements came from a geometric interface and current-state physical supervision, rather than an established temporal JEPA gain.
  • The tested temporal-learning variants did not surpass strong linear physical baselines in the completed phase. The frozen public coarse-grained polystyrene benchmark also retained a negative result for the tested JEPA predictor at the 800 ps horizon.

This phase sharpened the distinction between information in a molecular input, information retained by an encoder, and information used by a temporal predictor. The encoder comparison motivated the subsequent MACE JEPA line.

Scope & limitations

  • The evaluated targets summarize polymer geometry and local environment. Predicting these observables does not demonstrate generation of complete coarse-grained coordinate trajectories.
  • The results concern the recorded polymer configurations, data sources, and finite training protocols; they do not establish experimental-polymer generalization or a universal ranking of learning methods.
  • Technical seeds and correlated chain windows are not independent molecular systems. Current-state supervised gains are kept separate from temporal self-supervised gains.

Next project

MACE GPU resource study